Search This Blog

Saturday, October 31, 2009

New Bill to Support - HR 3149!!

...and I think we should take it up as our next cause!!

STATES WEIGH LIMITS ON CREDIT CHECKS FOR EMPLOYMENT


Do a few bad marks on your credit file make you a poor job candidate?

A handful of state and national law makers are saying "no." And they want to make sure that employers can't use credit as a litmus test for hiring.

Two states have already banned the practice, several more are considering it, and one Congressional committee is weighing a bill that would address the issue on a national basis.

"This is the tip of a very large iceberg," says Jay Stanley, privacy expert with the ACLU.

....


Recently, U.S. Rep. Steve Cohen of Tennessee sponsored the "Equal Employment for All Act," a national bill that would bar employers from using credit reports in hiring or promotions.

In researching the bill, Cohen and his staffers discovered that many of the credit-challenged were "young people, seniors, minorities and divorced women," says Steven Broderick, the congressman's communications director.

The bill (HR 3149), would ensure that "employers could not use a person's credit history against them," Broderick says. The bill has been sent to the House Financial Services Committee for consideration.


Don't know what everyone's situation is here....but I can tell you that several years back, after a less than amicable break up left my credit tarnished, I WAS turned down for a job - after making it through four rounds of interviews, calls to all the references I listed, computer testing, etc. Managed to get it back on track, and then I lost my job March 2008.

Twenty months later, I don't even want to RUN my credit report. Until this past month I paid my basics on time or early - rent, utilities, car insurance. Credit cards, etc - they got what I could pay, when I could pay it. Now, with no check for almost a month, and who knows how long it will take for NJ to disperse funds, I am certain the report is not painting a rosy picture. And THAT makes it that much more difficult to get a job - after putting out gas/toll money to go on interviews, they run the infamous credit report, and since I did not have a trust fund to ride out the past 2 years, I get the lovely rejection letter in the mail.

Read the article on the bill - it does have some exceptions, like upper management or people with access to money, but for most of us, I agree with Mr. Mendoza, and I would love to see more states pass this (or even the US Congress...I am sure they could work something out)

Opinions/thoughts?

Yeah, OK, let me get right on that!

So, I have my invite to my Corzine for Governor rally tomorrow (NJ) - Obama scheduled to appear.

Got an email letting me know what I CAN take in (cameras, invitation, ID) and what I can't (bags, umbrellas, liquids, strollers, signs).

Then they let me know they are doing a food drive - they would like everyone attending to bring a few items to be distributed to NJ food pantries. Uh.....I ate my last packet of Ramen, sorry, I have nothing to give. However, if you don't mind, I would LOVE to pick up a bag of stuff on the way OUT!! Think I should ask them????

Place Your Bets!!

When will the Senate finally vote and send this to the House?

  • A - Monday Night?
  • B - Tuesday Afternoon?
  • C - Tuesday Midnight?
  • D - Sometime Wednesday?
  • E - McConnell & Kyl have plans to blow up the Senate building to avoid the vote!

Here is one article that seems to think there is hope for Monday night


Also explains "The cloture filing fills the tree on the substitute amendment, meaning that Republican amendments on the floor will be prohibited."

My Vote............... E

OK, maybe not BLOW IT UP, but maybe set off the sprinklers so they all have to run outside.

Friday, October 30, 2009

REALLY?!?!?!?!?

This is the kind of BS we are all up against. Democrat or Republican, we all deserve to be told the truth.

Stimulus saved, created 650,000 jobs, gov't claims

The Unemployed and the Rising Price of Gas

I took this photo earlier this year. The lowest price I saw this year was $1.29 per gallon and that was in the end of January this year.

Below is just one story about an issue that just makes matters worse when you are trying to find a job. Last year the price of gas went through the roof, then something pretty amazing happened, the price dropped severely in a very short time. Once again we were told how another one of the problems caused by the Bush administration. Once again we are faced with the rising price of gas.

Please use this thread to write your thoughts, stories, share the prices you are currently facing, and stories regarding the issues with the price of gas. For one, it surely makes job searching a lot harder. With limited funds and the devastation already caused by the length of time we have been without benefits and jobs, we are all way behind with our bills, what are the effects of high gas prices on your job search and possibilities?


Crude prices near $80 again; retail gas up again
By MARK WILLIAMS (AP) – 22 hours ago
Oil prices rose sharply Thursday on new signs that the U.S. economy has rebounded, though crude levels globally continue to grow and there are few signs that actual demand for it has increased significantly.
The dollar fell once again, a factor throughout the year as crude hovers around $80 per barrel and a big reason why motorists have watched gasoline prices rise steadily for more than two weeks.
The average retail price for a gallon of gasoline is now less than a penny below highs reached during the U.S. driving season.
Benchmark crude for December delivery rose $2.41 to settle at $79.87 a barrel on the New York Mercantile Exchange.
The Commerce Department said Thursday that the economy grew at a 3.5 percent pace in the third quarter, the best showing in two years, fueled by government-supported spending on cars and homes. The report delivered the strongest signal yet that the economy entered a new, though fragile, phase of recovery and that the worst recession since the 1930s has ended.
"Any sort of encouragement with the economy is potentially bullish for oil," said oil trader and analyst Stephen Schork.
At the same time, global oil companies have reported that crude production grew during the quarter and American Electric Power, one of the nation's biggest utilities, said Thursday that electricity demand from industrial customers remains weak, but is showing signs of picking up.
Since last week, crude has retreated from $82 a barrel, the high for 2009, as the U.S. dollar gained back some of its losses from recent months.
Oil is largely bought and sold in dollars, which allows investors holding currencies like the euro or yen to buy more crude when the dollar falls.
When crude began rising in the middle of the month, gasoline prices that averaged less than $2.50 per gallon at the time began to tag along.
Pump prices rose for the 16th straight day Thursday, climbing 0.8 cents to $2.691 a gallon, according to AAA, Wright Express and Oil Price Information Service. That is 21.4 cents higher than a month ago and 10.2 cents higher than a year ago.
In other Nymex trading, heating oil rose 5.73 cents to settle at $2.0542 a gallon. Gasoline for November delivery added 3.26 cents to settle at $2.019 a gallon. Natural gas for December delivery gave up less than a penny to settle at $5.062 per 1,000 cubic feet.
In London, Brent crude for December delivery rose $2.18 to settle at $78.04 on the ICE Futures exchange.
Associated Press writers Pablo Gorondi in Budapest and Alex Kennedy in Singapore contributed to this report.
Copyright © 2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.
Related articles
OIL FUTURES: Oil Steady In Asia; Bulls Seem Reluctant
Wall Street Journal - 11 hours ago
Oil price up sharply on US growth
BBC News - 21 hours ago
Oil prices jump to USD 77.46
Myiris.com - 15 hours ago
More coverage (2084) »


Reid's statements this morning on C-Span

http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/289714-1

Time stamp 10:02 am - 10:05 am (ET)

  • No roll call votes today, next will be 5 pm Monday for HR 3548
  • Two amendments are attached: Homebuyer tax credit & Loss Carryback
  • House WILL accept it with those two amendments and wil pass it as early as Tuesday, and the POTUS will sign
  • IF Republicans still want to stall (ie, demand their 30 hours) then Senate may not vote until "sometime Tuesday night"
  • Did not indicate what a Tuesday night (or Wednesday morning) vote would mean as far as House timing.
So if the Republicans want to get some sleep Tuesday night, maybe they won't insist on their 30 hours, and the HOUSE WILL VOTE TUESDAY. I feel like I can almost breathe.

Don't forget time change this weekend, they get an extra hour to sleep Saturday night, lol

We Are On Track (sadly we took the local not the express)

Vote on unemployment extension pushed to Monday



WASHINGTON — The U.S. Senate will vote Monday evening on legislation extending unemployment benefits — a procedural vote that could clear the way for final passage as early as late Tuesday, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) just announced. The bill has been held up for weeks as party leaders have tangled over amendments, procedureand probably their picks in the World Series.

Monday’s cloture vote won’t pass the bill, but only ends the GOP filibuster, allowing the staging of the final vote. Senate rules dictate, however, that 30 hours must pass between the cloture vote and that on final passage — meaning that, absent a deal, the Senate can’t pass the bill much sooner than midnight on Tuesday.

Reid said the bill will include only two additional amendments: A tax credit for homebuyers, and a tax benefit allowing businesses to recoup taxes they paid in recent profitable years.

If an agreement is struck between the parties, all of this could change at any time.

Tsk Tsk Senator Kyl!!

If this goes to show you that those impassioned democratic speeches to empty rooms were not hitting the ears of the republicans, doncha think?


Jon Kyl Says Unemployment Benefits Haven't Run Out ...



In part (but go read the whole thing, it's good):

Moments ago, Sen. Jon Kyl (R-Ariz.) took to the chamber floor with a strange claim about the urgency surrounding legislation to extend unemployment insurance.

“The benefits haven’t run out yet,” Kyl said. “We’re going to pass this before the benefits run out.”

And in case anyone doubts that the Republicans are holding a gun to the heads of the unemployed purely for political purposes, put them away:

Kyl claimed that Democrats are to blame for stalling legislation to extend unemployment benefits because party leaders are resisting consideration of several unrelated GOP amendments.

“We could have been done with this bill 24 hours ago,” Kyl said. “We didn’t ask for the delay.”

Thursday, October 29, 2009

FrontLine "Close To Home"

Frontline did a story on the issue of unemployment. Its great to watch. Its done in NYC's upper Eastside. They talk about the filling out of online applications and how they are received by companies and how they just get kicked if there is one thing wrong. Lots of great info. Not sure if its online, but it should be.

On C-Span at the Close of the Day, a Cloture Motion to Bring the Bill to the Floor for a Vote Next Week

Are we watching Cspan? Reid is dealing with the bill! Cloturing the bill with only the three amendments.

GOP Sets Up More Roadblocks To Unemployment Benefits Extension

http://progressillinois.com/2009/10/29/gop-adds-new-roadblocks-to-ui-extension

Almost two days after the H.R. 3548 survived its first cloture vote, there has been no major movement on the bill that would extend unemployment insurance for Americans who have exhausted their benefits. Why? Republicans keep throwing up new procedural barriers.

After reaching a bipartisan agreement to include an amendment extending the first-timehomebuyer's tax credit, Senate Republicans agreed today to drop their efforts to weigh down the legislation with controversial amendments regarding ACORN and the E-Verify program. In exchange, they've turned to a new form of obstruction: demanding a vote on two new controversial amendments. The first would speed up the expiration date for the Troubled Asset Relief Program (a non-starter for Democrats who point out that a sunset date for the bank bailouts is already written into law). The second is yet another attempt to change to the way the extension is funded, by using "unspent" stimulus money, rather than the federal unemployment surtax, which amounts to 0.2 percent tax on the initial $7,000 of employees' wages.

As we've discussed before, funding an extension through the surtax is a sound strategy. After all, unemployment benefits have been extended so frequently over the past 30 years, many businesses have already budgeted for it. And it's not exactly a hefty expense, costing employers, on average, an extra $14 per employee annually. The GOP opposition is nothing more than petty politics.

Until those details can be ironed out, the legislation will stay lodged in the upper chamber. And every day that it does, another 350 Illinois families will exhaust their benefits.

Dear Sen. Reid, Could you BE less clear?

OK, so no votes today.

Not in session again til Monday, but they WILL have a vote on Monday at 5:30-6:00.

He said that is so it will be done by midnight Tuesday.

....though, you know, they COULD work something out.

All I can figure out is.....he will invoke cloture before closing today. Friday will count as the "dead" day (is that possible if they are not in session? I can't remember anymore). Monday they vote by 6 pm. 30 hours run. They vote at midnight Tuesday (which please, will never happen).

So, IF all that occurs, could it go to the House on Wednesday still?


There is your answer to what now....

More of the same.

And...what NOW?

What Now?

Does anyone know what is going on, or what is coming next? It seems that someone is asleep at the wheel in the Senate.... Everything but Unemployment Extension is being discussed.

Never Again. My Solution.

So fed up. Dems, Repubs, just fed up. Just ordered books from the library about obtaining dual citizenship and moving to Costa Rica. Private health insurance is available for $250 a year. Brand new condos for rent (including cable, high speed internet, electricity, water) for $400 a month. Or you can buy a small 2 BR oceanfront condo for $40K. They have no army. There is summer all year round. Why the F am I sitting in NJ watching C-Span? Once there are jobs I will work three for the next few years so I can just skip town and go live in the tropics, kayaking and surfing.

Who is in?

Today in The News

Would Senate vote on unemployment extensions discourage job seekers in Michigan? Or prevent a far worse fate?

AP Photo | Carlos Osorio
Men wait outside a staffing agency office last week in southwest Detroit. An expected Senate vote on extending unemployment benefits is generating debate among readers.

I've touched a nerve with readers.

A post I did Wednesday about how an expected U.S. Senate vote to extend unemployment benefits by as much as 20 weeks could help many residents whose benefits will soon expire in Michigan went off the charts, becoming my most-read single post by a long shot.

It's not entirely surprising; there are an estimated 450,000 residents currently receiving unemployment insurance benefits in the state, and Michigan's jobless rate was highest among states for September at 15.3 percent. The state is also running up a debt that was $2.8 billion as of Oct. 23 as it borrows from the federal government to pay out benefits.

Readers weren't shy about making their feelings known. Many likened unemployment benefits to "band-aids."

"Please do not extended the unemployment benefits. Its time to rip the band-aid off and let the real healing begin," read a common sentiment from willmiller82.

But "We're in the worst time since the Depression," wrote Mrs. Smith. "It's okay to bail out a bank so they can screw up the money and give out big bonuses, but God forbid the average person who's been laid-off through no fault of their own (and) needs help. Then it's time to rip the band-aid off."

"Remember, the unemployed of Michigan receiving a so-called 'free paycheck' did not quit their jobs – they were laid-off at no fault of their own," adds rmh820.

Still, getittogether suggests, "There's such a fine line between enabling and helping" and says people may need to accept that a new job likely won't pay what they're accustomed to earning. "Something has got to give here. We cannot extend unemployment benefits indefinitely. After a certain point you might as well call it what it is... welfare."

So: Would a 20-week extension of unemployment benefits for displaced Michigan workers simply extend a costly comfort zone and discourage more people from finding jobs?

Or would it assist hard-working residents squeezed by the worst economy in generations and prevent a far worse fate for our state?

• Leave your thoughts in the comments area below, which I regularly check. Or contact me directly at mijobsblogger (at) gmail (dot) com, or follow me at twitter.com/sveng.

http://www.mlive.com/michigan-job-search/index.ssf/2009/10/michigan_readers_weight_pros_cons_of_sen.html

WILL THIS BE THE DAY ???

Wednesday, October 28, 2009

Adjourned until 9:30 am

Sen Whitehouse did the honors @ 8:05 pm

Congress convenes at 9:30 am tomorrow.

They are allowing only 10 minutes per side for Morning Business.

Tune in about 9:55 am for a showdown!!

Casey of Pa

Senator Casey from PA just said that they are going to need to pass the bill to cover Cobra very soon too. For those of you who dont know that is what is written in HR3404 the bill to extend the stimulus package from last year into next next. This was an issue from the start. That bill was introduced to the House in July and has been dangling around since then. Once they deal with this bill HR3548 they are going to have to get right back at it with HR3404. The Senate will never get anything done this session.

So, How Are You All Enjoying Post-Cloture?

Is it everything you had dreamed? LOL

Or am I the only one that wants to put a shoe through their TV set?

Doing my best to take a C-Span break, but a few minutes later I have it right back on. Found ONE new job posting, so off to the post office soon to drop a resume packet to them. House phone is turned off, so I have to go to Sprint to add some minutes to the cell phone, and pull my home number off all my resumes. Then home to cook some pasta. Plain. Yum.

Ah - post-cloture - you are too good to me!

According the Pelosi's and MeDermott's and The Income Security and Family Support Commitee offices

I was in a discussion with someone after receiving the email from NELP regarding where the bill would go after passage in the Senate and this is what I was told.

We have been thinking that the bill could go back to Pelosi or a committee for approval in the House, but according to what I was just told by Pelosi's office and confirmed by McDermott's office, the changes are already to substantial to be just heard by committee. There are two changes, one is the amount of weeks that House agreed on and Two is that the bill in the senate now includes all states. Accordingly, what I am being told is that the Bill will have to go before the entire House for a vote with the changes.

I would encourage everyone to seek out some answers from the House. While there is always the possibility that the information I was just given is incorrect, the more offices we talk to the better the consensus we can come to.

I also called the Ways and Means Committee and they forwarded me to the Income Security and Family Support Committee and he told me the same thing, THE BILL IN THE SENATE IS NO LONGER THE SAME BILL AS IT WAS IN THE HOUSE AND THEREFORE WILL HAVE TO GO BACK TO THE HOUSE FLOOR, not just Pelosi or a committee, but the entire house to vote on the new bill!

Clarification From NELP

I just received an email from a contract I have with NELP. She sent me this email.

Alexandra

I just spoke with one of NELP’s contacts in Washington and I just wanted to update you.

After last night's overwhelming vote for cloture, there will be more negotiations in order to try to get the minority on board with the bill. It is important to have the minority on board so the bill can pass very quickly. If this small minority holds out, it could take until the end of next week to get the bill passed. If they can't reach an agreement, Senator Reid will move to get the bill passed as quickly as possible without the minority vote.

Since the Senate's version of the bill is different than the House bill, the bill must go back to the House and be approved there. If the Senate can pass the bill tomorrow, then the House can consider the bill on Tuesday or Wednesday. If the Senate does not pass the bill until next week, then the House will consider the bill on the following Tuesday or Wednesday. Right now the most we can do is continue to demand that our respective Senators to take urgent action.

Retroactive Pay:

The new bill allows for retroactive eligibility, but not retroactive pay. Retroactive eligibility means that people who exhausted their benefits prior to the passage of the bill are still covered. However these people will not be entitled to a lump sum payment when the bill is passed. The major reason retroactive payment is not in this bill is that we just cannot afford it. If there was any way for us to be pushing for retroactive pay we definitely would do so. We understand people out there are hurting and right now the main thing is to get this bill passed so we can help those in dire need as soon as possible.

Stabenow on Unemployment Insurance: ‘We Could Have Done This Three Weeks Ago’

The following paragraph is from the end of this article. A few days ago a few Senators made note of the fact that this could require a 2nd cloture petition. Here is an article that speaks to that comment. To read the entire article click on the link title link to read it.

The Senate is set to vote tomorrow to begin consideration of the proposal — a procedural move requiring 60 votes to pass. But that’s just be the start of the process. Without an agreement over the amendments, Democratic leaders will have to stage a second cloture vote in order to move to a final vote on the bill. The series of procedural steps could easily push that final vote to the end of the week.

Only the public’s ignorance of the process, some Democrats claim, is preventing a backlash against Republicans. “If the public understood what was holding up this legislation,” Shaheen said, “they would be outraged.”

“And rightly so,” she added.

PRINT

12:26 am - yeah ok!

They calculated this morning when 30 hours will run - 12:26 am. So, in other words, even though everyone is CLAIMING they want to vote today, the games continue and at this point, we may be looking at a vote tomorrow morning (unless the Senate pulls an all nighter, lol)

Reid this morning


9:32 am - 9:39 am

Synopsis:

Post cloture runs out at 12:26 am Thursday. Wants to work something out with Republicans, will work out vote ASAP. May have to be in the morning, but may be able to avoid it.
Vote yesterday was later than wanted - but a Senator was quite ill. He has bipartisan support to discuss First Time Homebuyers Tax Credit & Loss Carryback (for small business). Could get original bill and these matters done in two hours (with repubs indicating to him they don't even need two hours)

McConnell interrupts:

Agrees this can be done today, impasse is unnecessary. Number of amendments is "modest" and he would agree to time agreements on them, to wrap this up. Agrees there is support on both sides for the original bill as well as the two amendments Reid mentioned, but he still wants to debate all his proposed amendments.

Reid responds:

Republican amendments are argumentative. Lists out how many times the Repubs have stopped/stalled things this year, number of filibusters & forcing Dems to invoke cloture. Additional amendments are not germane and only an effort to slow things down, he is not going to agree. Said two amendments he is agreeing to are fully paid for. No reason for other amendments which are only an attempt to embarrass people.

McConnell:

Several days ago they were withing one amendment of agreeing. He is still pushing for his additional amendments, and is open to time agreements - which would wrap things up much earlier than if all the time needs to run to late tonight (as in 12:26 am)

*******

So, sounds like McConnell is willing to let the entire 30 hours run if he can't have his amendments heard, and Reid is not going to let in additional amendments. So unless they pass the peace pipe sometime today, this might not happen now until early tomorrow.

Stay tuned!

Tuesday, October 27, 2009

How The Reconciliation Process Works

OK, so what happens when (not if, when) the Senate passes their version of HR 3548, but it differs from the version passed in the House?

Found some good & easy to follow definitions for various procedures (ie: awaiting floor action, bringing bill to floor, etc) - all these phrases we have heard tossed around this past month....on a cancer advocacy site of all places, but it is the most concise and easiest understood source I have found (I am very anti-wikopedia)

Here is the site if you want to look up what any other stuff means http://www.zerocancer.org/site/PageNavigator/The_Legislative_Process

This is what it has to say about this next hurdle:

Reconciling House/Senate Differences


Once both chambers have passed similar versions of the same bill, the differences must be reconciled before the legislation can be sent to the President for his decision to sign or not sign the bill into law. Differences between House and Senate versions of a bill may be resolved most easily when one chamber simply adopts the other's version without change. Usually, differences are resolved through one of two procedures: by a process known as amendments between the Houses or by conference committee negotiations.

In Amendments between the Houses, the bill is traded back and forth between the chambers with each offering amendments to the other body's version until one chamber adopts the latest amendment of the other without change.

Conference committee negotiations are the more well known of the two methods used to reconcile differences between the two bodies. In the House, conferees or the managers on the part of the House are appointed by the Speaker at the recommendation of the committee chairmen involved. In the Senate, the conferees are chosen strictly by the committee chairmen going to conference.

Once configured, conference committees have few rules to follow. One important restriction in the rules of both the House and Senate limit Conferees to matters in disagreement between the two chambers. The rules state clearly that conferees may not delete provisions identical in both bills nor may they insert subject matter not found in either the House or Senate-passed bill. Moreover, the conferees are asked to stay within the range of differences, i.e. not exceed the boundaries that define the House and Senate bills.

***********

So, the way I am reading this - either the House can vote on the Senate's amendment, accepting it as is, and shoot it off to the POTUS, or the House & Senate can put together a committee to hammer it out and come to an agreement - only thing they could not delete would be items found in both bills.

So, does this mean if they use the conference committees that the committee can toss out any Senate Amendments they don't like?

I have heard another possibility tossed around on the blogs about Pelosi being able to just sign it, since it is an "emergency measure" but I have yet to find that process outlined anywhere officially, nor have I seen any reporter mention anything other than it needing to be reconciled with the House version.

I am certain Reid & Pelosi have already discussed and decided on how they will push this through, but us?

Stay tuned!!

Sorry, Can't Resist Posting This ☺


Obama Officially Backs Extension Of Jobless Benefits


http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/2009/10/27/us/politics/politics-us-usa-unemployment-obama.html

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Obama administration on Tuesday officially threw its weight behind legislation making its way through Congress to provide additional weeks of unemployment benefits to help Americans hit by rising joblessness.

A bill to extend jobless benefits to nearly 2 million people has been approved by the House but has stalled in the Senate amid Republican objections over how to fund it.

**************

So there you have it!

************

and a more detailed story on today's actions, by the AP

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5hLKyB9H7lUpiALFVlU7RRJa9-EfwD9BJO5082

Senate votes to take up jobless benefit extension

long article, but in part:

After weeks of political haggling, the Senate agreed Tuesday to take up legislation that would give people running out of unemployment insurance benefits up to 20 more weeks of federal aid.

The White House issued a statement in support of extending benefits. "Helping unemployed workers is an effective way to boost the economy and an important part of the administration's broader efforts to move swiftly and aggressively to jump start job creation and grow our economy."

As the Senate voted, Senate leaders were still trying to reach agreement on a formula to extend the homebuyer credit and whether it would be combined with the unemployment bill or brought up separately. The Senate expected to begin taking up amendments on Wednesday.

Long article though, click the link and read it all when you have time

Per Closing Remarks, Possible Vote TOMORROW

Very end of the day, Shaheen's statements were just past 7:00 (eastern time)


As of now, C-Span has the video cutting off just as she gets to it.....should be updated soon.

My recollections is that she said something about the time they are adjourned or in recess WILL COUNT toward the 30 hours, and that they are hopeful 30 hours won't be needed. Therefore, they may be able to vote tomorrow.

Waiting for the video link to update and I will type out what she said.

OK, VIDEO LINK UPDATED - AT 7:09 (ET)

(Shorthand Version, not word for word)

Adjourn until 9:30 tomorrow, 2 hours morning business

Resume consideration of the Motion to Proceed to HR 3548 post cloture, and that time during any period of morning business, recess, or adjournment count post cloture.

(Without Objection, So Ordered)

Cloture was invoked on the motion to proceed to the Unemployment Extension legislation.

It is my hope that some of the post cloture debate time can be yielded back and we can proceed to the bill tomorrow.

HR 3548 IN CLOTURE

How To Read The Blog.

If anyone is wondering how to follow the posts or threads on the blog, on the left hand side is an archive list. Each line is a thread and when there is something new posted in that thread it will change colors so you know there is new information. Also, if you just generally work your way down the list from top to bottom as it runs from newest to oldest posts. The comments are listed after the original post in the thread.

Amanda, I hope that helps. This is a blog that we developed through blogger.com and while there might be away to make things easier, it is set up the best way I know so that everything in the archives shows up for you to see.

It does take a bit of getting used to but it is easy. Just refresh the page when you come back to it if you leave it open and the color will change as people post their comments.

I ♥ C-Span (ha!)

Reed (RI) was on at 10:37 am (Eastern) today, saying there may need to be up to THREE separate cloture votes needed . Also gave a brief history of prior UB extensions under Bush the Dad, Reagan, Clinton, etc - and the bipartisan support each extension received. Also discussed the Republican amendments. Ended saying he hoped it would be passed tonight, rather than having to go through a long cloture process.


Durbin was on right after him at 10:47 am to express his "concern & dismay" over the inability to get the extension passed. Again blasted on the ACORN amendment & the E-Verify amendment (immigration status). He spoke on unemployment for about 6 minutes, and then switches over to healthcare.

....please pass the tylenol

CLOTURE VOTE ON H R 3548 6:00 PM TUESDAY 10/27/2009

Monday, October 26, 2009

In The News (Monday 10.26.08)

Unemployment extension in flux, but closer to a vote


http://www.examiner.com/x-19285-Chicago-Economic-Policy-Examiner~y2009m10d26-Unemployment-extension-in-flux-but-closer-to-a-vote

Discussions continue in the corridors and offices of the Senate regarding details of a measure extending the home buyer tax credit through part or all of next summer’s selling season, with the hope a compromise can be reached in time for attachment to the pending bill extending unemployment benefits 14 or 20 weeks. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid has given negotiators a deadline of tomorrow to come to terms, or he has said he will bring the unemployment benefit extension bill to the Senate floor as a stand alone measure. Other Senators are still looking for a way to attach a business tax loss carry back extension to the unemployment benefits measure.

If the unemployment benefit extension passes the Senate all by itself, it will likely sail through the House the very next day. If it comes over encumbered with tax loss carry backs and home buyer credits hanging on the Christmas tree, the House may be tempted to tinker with the details of those measures, even if it means further delays for voters whose unemployment benefits ran out weeks or months ago.

(This is why we DO need to be concerned about what amendments are attached. Better it take a couple extra days in the Senate to fly through he House, than to be moved quickly from this point in the Senate, to stall out again in the House)

**********

McConnell: Not Acceptable to Pass Unemployment Extension Without GOP Amendments



This afternoon, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) and Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) squared off on the chamber floor over how to proceed on legislation to extend unemployment benefits at least 14 weeks. Needless to say, they failed to reach an agreement, with McConnell rejecting Reid’s motion to scraptomorrow’s cloture vote and move directly to the bill, and Reid declining a counter-proposal to move to an alternative bill offered by McConnell.

Observers of the weeks-long debate might not be surprised to learn that the sticking points remain the same: McConnell is insisting on consideration of an amendment to prevent ACORN from receiving federal funds, and another designed to filter illegal immigrants out of the workforce. The Kentucky Republican said the eight amendments Republicans are offering won’t take much longer to consider than the six provisions Reid has proposed on behalf of Democrats.

“Under my consent agreement,” McConnell said, “we would finish about as rapidly as we would under the consent agreement that the majority leader just propounded.”

Reid didn’t bite, citing the two controversial amendments, which Democrats say are unrelated to the underlying proposal.

“I see no reason that we have to do immigration on this bill — that’s what E-Verify is all about,” Reid said. “I don’t know how many more times we have to pound on ACORN — we’ve voted on that many times already.”

Reid then asked for McConnell’s consent to pass the unemployment extension without any amendments at all. McConnell’s response:

There’s no reason why we can’t reach an agreement to take up the underlying bill with a limited number of [amendments], and finish the bill expeditiously. Simply cutting people off and not allowing any amendments at all is not an acceptable approach for the minority, therefore I object.

************

Stabenow on Unemployment Insurance: ‘We Could Have Done This Three Weeks Ago’



In part:

In a call with reporters Monday, Sen. Debbie Stabenow (D-Mich.) said the GOP amendments — which include efforts to screen illegal aliens out of the job market and prevent ACORN from receiving federal funds — amount to little more than “a political agenda” intended to stall the Democrats’ policy priorities. Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.) charged that the Republican offerings aren’t designed to better the underlying bill, “but to make partisan political points.” And Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) couldn’t come up with a justification. “I don’t know how anyone can explain it,” she said.

Yet Stabenow dismissed the notion that the Democrats could have acted more quickly to pass the UI extension, arguing that Republicans have used filibusters to stall legislation throughout the year, creating a backlog of legislation that’s slowed progress to a crawl. "This has become a tactic,” Stabenow said. “We could have done this three weeks ago.”

The Senate is set to vote tomorrow to begin consideration of the proposal — a procedural move requiring 60 votes to pass. But that’s just be the start of the process. Without an agreement over the amendments, Democratic leaders will have to stage a second cloture vote in order to move to a final vote on the bill. The series of procedural steps could easily push that final vote to the end of the week. Only the public’s ignorance of the process, some Democrats claim, is preventing a backlash against Republicans. “If the public understood what was holding up this legislation,” Shaheen said, “they would be outraged.” “And rightly so,” she added.


Now the Cloture Vote is 5:30 Tuesday

Amazing! How is it possible that they just keep pushing this vote out further and further and we just keep getting stuck in deeper and deeper in their BS. I just want to bury my head in the pillow and go to sleep forever! I am tired of all their nonsense!

UNREAL

Reid tries again to bring it to the floor today with some amendments - Baucus, Homeowner Tax Credit, TARP, and 2 others (6 total)

http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/289630-1 ( @ 2:17 pm - 2:28 pm Eastern time)

McConnell objects @ 2:19 pm (proposed it go forward with EIGHT amendments instead - including immigration & ACORN)

Reid responded he was trying to limit the amendments to those that might have SOMETHING to do with unemployment. Said he does not want just a vote on cloture, but that the Senate is sending out the wrong message McConnell said the additional amendments would not take any additional floor time, and wanted the proceed & asked for unanimous consent to HR3548 with the EIGHT amendments. Reid then objects, and expressed concern over why they could not vote on JUST unemployment, and does not think Americans should suffer while the Republicans try to add on inappropriate matters.

McConnell suggests a time agreement.

So we have two competing consent agreements (one with 6 amendments, one with 8), both objected to.

Reid then suggests HR 3548 with NO amendments. McConnell objects.

So, Dems want just one amendments really (Baucus), Repubs want 8, Dems offer 6, Repubs claim Dems are not willing to negotiate the number of amendments. (Seems to me that 6 is more than meeting them halfway....guess I was never good at math)

I can't even transcribe what was said, I feel sick to my stomach.


UPDATE - Durbin's follow up to what happened today @ about 3:10 pm (Eastern)

Sunday, October 25, 2009

Weekend Update

Good Morning!
While during the weekends there is usually nothing to report, I wanted to show the current update that NY is showing on the Unemployment website. They have continued to update the website periodically to inform claimants of the status of the proposed Emergency Extension. Currently the following blurb is at the top of the page:

Unemployment Benefit Extensions
Federal legislation is pending for additional weeks of emergency benefits. Please continue to claim weekly benefits in the usual manner. It is not necessary to file a new claim, unless you are advised to do so. For updates, continue checking this website or click here for more details regarding benefit extensions.

This update was posted since Thursday evening, which was the last time I checked it. Additionally NY is warning claimants to continue their work search or if you do not participate in the work search for any reason they should not claim benefits for that week or they stand to lose 4 weeks benefits. See next paragraph

Advisory for Individuals Claiming Extended Benefits
If you failed to search for work during the past week for any reason, you should not claim extended benefits for that week; otherwise you may be disqualified from receiving benefits until you have worked for four (4) weeks and earned four (4) times your weekly benefit amount.


With the cloture vote scheduled for 2:30PM on Tuesday, we should spend Monday and Tuesday morning making calls and sending emails to all the Senators, encouraging them to work fast and resolve this issue in such a manner so the bill will not take any longer than it has already. It's important to make sure they continue to hear that this bill was an EMERGENCY measure and we have not seen much EMERGENCY progress from the Senate. This bill needs to hit the desk of the President by Friday for his signature. Any additional amendments attached to this bill will slow down the process. When they vote on the amendments everyone should keep in mind how long they have already help the process up.

Please continue to share your thoughts and ideas and we will see you online tomorrow.

Friday, October 23, 2009

The "Amendments"

Library of Congress is showing four (4) amendments at this time


There is NOT a lot of info on any of them at this point, text is left blank or says "will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration" so I am digging to see if there is anywhere else with more info,or if we won't know until next week.

#1) The first (2668) must be the old Baucus Amendment that we knew about (changing it from 13 weeks for high states, to 14 for all, extra 6 for high) - shows 38 co-sponsors. Submitted 10-8-09

#2) #2695, sponsored by Sen. Sessions; Submitted 10-20-09
Says it is " TITLE--MEDICAL CARE ACCESS PROTECTION" & "TITLE II--EMPLOYMENT ELIGIBILITY VERIFICATION"

#3) #2698, Submitted 10-22-09, sponsored by Sen. Feingold

Mr. FEINGOLD submitted an amendment intended to be proposed by him to the bill H.R. 3548, to amend the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2008 to provide for the temporary availability of certain additional emergency unemployment compensation, and for other purposes; which was ordered to lie on the table; as follows:

At the appropriate place, insert the following:

SEC. __X. ELIMINATION OF AUTOMATIC PAY ADJUSTMENTS FOR MEMBERS OF CONGRESS.

and #4 ) #2699, submitted 10-22-09, sponsored by Sen. Isakson (co-sponsor Dodd)

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/D?r111:1:./temp/~r111pgGYBQ::

SA 2699. Mr. ISAKSON (for himself and Mr. Dodd) submitted an amendment intended to be proposed by him to the bill H.R. 3548, to amend the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2008 to provide for the temporary availability of certain additional emergency unemployment compensation, and for other purposes; which was ordered to lie on the table; as follows:

At the end, insert the following:

SEC. __. CREDIT FOR CERTAIN HOME PURCHASES.

(a) Elimination of First-Time Homebuyer Requirement.--

(1) IN GENERAL.--Subsection (a) of section 36 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``who is a first-time homebuyer of a principal residence'' and inserting ``who purchases a principal residence''.

*****************

Numbers shown are "Senate Amendment Numbers"

So, we knew (and liked) the first.

We knew the fourth was coming (homebuyer tax credit). Hopefully it is not enough of an issue to hang things up, since the White House has not been very supportive of this extension (and Isakson wants to get rid of the restriction that it be for first time home buyers only). We might see a lot of the debate time going to this one.

I am a little foggy on #2 & #3, hopefully I can find something that gives a bit more info, but at first glance neither seems to be very worrisome (though who knows what either really means)

At least, so far, I don't see anything about immigration, TARP/stimulus funds, or ACORN.

If anyone finds more info on the amendments, please share!!



Noodles4Nothing On NELP website!

http://www.unemployedworkers.org/sites/unemployedworkers/index.php/resources

Our Noodles4Nothing Campaign, listed as Unemployed Workers Using Their Noodles is now listed on the NELP website. Please follow the link to check it out.

Also, I would ask all of you to please help spread the word to friends and family members to start using their noodles. We have a date that the senate is voting on cloture but this is not a done deal until the issues with unemployment are resolved. The more we do the more attention we bring to the issues.

In The News: Friday, October 23

Today's NELP Update


Progress Being Made in Senate on Extension Bill (October 23,2009)

Friends – the Senate Majority Leader, Harry Reid, and Finance Chair, Max Baucus, are reportedly making progress in negotiating with Republicans about amendments to the unemployment insurance extension bill and finding a favorable schedule in which to take up and vote on this bill. They hope to have it passed by the end of next week, though that is just a hope, not a guarantee. But the bill is moving, and the press is telling your story with increasing frequency. Please keep up the calls and the pressure on all in the Senate - tell them to pass a bill they know the House can pass quickly, and do it as soon as possible. Every day they make you wait is a day you will never recapture.

http://www.unemployedworkers.org/sites/unemployedworkers/index.php/benefits

*************


Update:


Isakson Looks to Continue Home Buyer Tax Credit via Unemployment Extension Bill

Senator Johnny Isakson (R-GA) intends to propose an amendment to theUnemployment Compensation Extension Act (H.R. 3548) that would extend and expand the $8,000 home buyer tax credit through June 30, 2010, by removing the first-time home buyer requirement and raising the annual income ceilings to $150,000 for individuals and $300,000 for married couples. Only first-time home buyers currently qualify for the tax credit, which was enacted under the Economic Recovery and Reinvestment Act (P.L. 111-5), and is set to expire on Nov. 30, 2009. Isakson's proposal is estimated to cost $16.7 billion over five years.

Senate Democratic and Republican leaders yesterday agreed to postpone today's scheduled vote on whether to proceed to consideration of the unemployment benefits extension legislation. That vote will now occur on Tuesday, Oct. 27. The body is expected to vote in favor of moving to the bill and then begin debate on amendments. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) has been seeking an agreement with the Republican leadership on a set list of amendments, an objective that in part has slowed the bill's movement in the Senate.

As passed by the House, H.R. 3548 would extend unemployment benefits to states where the unemployment rate is 8.5 percent or higher. However, Reid and Senate Finance Chairman Max Baucus (D-MT) are expected to offer a substitute amendment to the House-passed bill that would provide an extension to all 50 states by up to 14 weeks, and up to 20 weeks for states with unemployment levels exceeding 8.5 percent. The cost of both proposals would be offset by extending the federal unemployment tax.

"Next week will be a busy week," Reid said yesterday during a floor statement. "We hope to complete action on the Unemployment Insurance Extension Act, Commerce-Justice-Science Appropriations, and Military Construction Appropriations. We also need to pass a continuing resolution before the end of the week."


***********

Here is one perspective on why we got bumped to next week

Hate Crimes Dispute Delays Senate Vote On Jobless Benefits



By Corey Boles, Of DOW JONES NEWSWIRES

WASHINGTON -(Dow Jones)- A Senate vote on an extension of federal jobless benefits has been delayed until at least next Tuesday due to a dispute between lawmakers over hate crime legislation being attached to a bill to fund the Department of Defense in fiscal 2010.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D., Nev.) said earlier that he had hoped to bring forward legislation Thursday that would provide up to 20 extra weeks of federal unemployment benefits to people out of work long-term.

But after a several-hour standoff over Republican opposition to attaching a measure extending hate crimes protection for homosexuals to the defense authorization bill, the effort to extend jobless benefits has been delayed until next week.


http://www.nasdaq.com/aspx/stock-market-news-story.aspx?storyid=200910221717dowjonesdjonline001025&title=hate-crimes-dispute-delays-senate-vote-on-jobless-benefits

The BIG Picture: WE Need JOBS

Obama Wrestling With Jobs Outlook




(From the Wall St Journal)

WASHINGTON -- Increasingly alarmed over bleak employment forecasts, the Obama administration is searching for ways to boost job growth without adding to the federal budget deficit.

White House economist Christina Romer, in remarks that ratcheted up the administration's pessimism, told a congressional panel Thursday that "labor market conditions will remain painfully weak through 2010." She said that the jobless rate, which hit 9.8% last month, would likely remain "at its severely elevated level" for at least another year.

In testimony before the congressional Joint Economic Committee, Ms. Romer said the federal stimulus package will have its greatest effects this year and "will likely be contributing little to growth" by the middle of next year. She also warned that the growing clamor to address the high unemployment rate had to be balanced against the rising tide of red ink.

Obama aides and Democratic lawmakers face sharp restraints as they weigh new options for job creation heading into an election year. They are loath to take steps that would suggest their $787 billion stimulus package isn't sufficiently effective. And they are wary of adding to the budget deficit, which for the fiscal year ended Sept. 30 topped $1.4 trillion, a level not seen since World War II.

Most of the proposals being considered would extend programs already under way. The White House now appears ready to back the extension of an $8,000 tax credit for first-time home buyers. Many Democratic lawmakers support the idea, though the program's credibility has been undermined by reports of thousands of fraudulent and erroneous claims.

Obama aides have also embraced extending enhanced unemployment-insurance benefits, which Congress is likely to approve over the next few days, and subsidies for the unemployed to purchase health insurance.

The White House is also moving to inject capital into small businesses. President Barack Obama proposed legislation Wednesday to raise the ceiling on certain Small Business Administration loans. The White House also wants Congress to approve steps to provide lower-cost capital to community banks. Both would use existing funds from the Troubled Asset Relief Program.

Another White House proposal would redeploy TARP funds to help struggling rural and urban communities by offering small-businesses loans at 2% interest for up to eight years.

Members of the White House economic team are now meeting twice a week, on average, to discuss job creation, according to a senior administration official who participates. The discussions are "lively," with sharp differences over what will work quickly and effectively, this person said. The administration plans to eschew any larger package of jobs measures in favor of a series of smaller programs.

But skepticism remains high over whether any of the measures under consideration would spur significant job creation. Business executives are calling for more dramatic moves, including passage of a proposed six-year, $500 billion highway infrastructure bill, which some Democrats want to see funded through an increase in gasoline taxes.

"The reality for our industry is that the stimulus bill has not been a jobs bill," Ron DeFeo, chief executive of Terex Corp., said in an interview. With construction down sharply across the U.S., Terex, one of the world's largest construction-equipment makers by sales, has laid off 4,000 U.S. employees since the summer of 2008. Mr. DeFeo, who says he plans to be "very judicious" in rehiring, has been lobbying lawmakers to move ahead quickly on the highway bill.

The Obama administration has called for holding off on a big highway bill until next year, partly to avoid Republican portrayal of the bill as another stimulus package.

The White House, meanwhile, has been seeking ideas recently from the private sector, including from a group of high-level CEOs who are in frequent contact with Mr. Obama's top economic advisers.

Dan DiMicco, chief executive of steelmaker Nucor Corp., was part of a private CEO lunch with Mr. Obama in late July. He and his staff have since advised the White House to redirect federal stimulus money into more immediate infrastructure projects.

"The reality is that we have to find ways to create millions and millions of new jobs over the next five years," Mr. DiMicco said.

Other CEOs have called for corporate tax cuts to spur job growth, an avenue the administration appears unlikely to take.

In Congress, many Democrats are reluctant to take on more costly initiatives, preferring to wait a month or two before deciding whether to push through bigger-ticket ideas. Rep. Chris Van Hollen (D., Md.) said lawmakers increasingly agree that some intermediate steps must be taken, including the unemployment-insurance extension, the health-coverage subsidy and the home buyers' tax credit. "As for additional bigger-ticket items, that will depend on how the economy develops," Mr. Van Hollen said.

But Democrats worry about heading into an election year with joblessness so high. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi -- who said Wednesday that "the No. 1 subject on the minds of the American people" was "jobs, jobs, jobs" -- has asked the chairs of committees controlling spending for ideas on quick job creation.